The United States and North Carolina Constitutions both guarantee that individual freedoms must be protected in our country. Those freedoms consist of, but are not limited to, free speech, association and religion. Moreover, the UNC System Office mandates that all 17 of its constituent institutions must comply with these laws and its policy. As a result, Appalachian State University (University) is committed to upholding and protecting these freedoms.
In particular, freedom of speech is often at conflict on a college campus and to address this issue, our executive leadership has adopted an inclusive excellence model. This means that the University recognizes that its success as an institution will depend on welcoming the rich diverse values and opinions of all students, staff, faculty and visitors.
Consequently, University departments and organizations frequently engage in meaningful dialogue on freedom of speech throughout each academic year. These take the form of classroom discussions, programs and events like Constitution Day in which students, faculty, staff and visitors honor and often debate First Amendment topics.
Finally, the University is fortunate to have two individuals — Chief Diversity Officer Jamie Parson and Assistant Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs Jeff Cathey — who serve as liaisons for the UNC System Office. These individuals, known as Free Speech Responsible Officers, were appointed by Provost and Executive Vice Chancellor Heather Hulburt Norris and Vice Chancellor of Student Affairs J.J. Brown, per Chancellor Sheri Everts' request. These individuals are tasked with ensuring that the law and UNC System policy regarding free speech and expression on campus are upheld and they are also available to answer any questions or concerns related to free speech or free expression. Together, the University will work to protect both constitutions while protecting the freedoms of all who come to our great University.
Latest Message from Free Speech Responsible Officers
Oct 17, 2022
Each UNC constituent institution has identified individuals tasked with ensuring compliance with the law and UNC policy regarding free speech and expression on campus, and for answering any questions or concerns from students, faculty, staff or others related to campus free speech or free expression. As App State's identified Free Speech Responsible Officers, we work closely with units across campus to meet the needs of our faculty, staff and students.
Frequently Asked Questions About the First Amendment and App State
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution states, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press; or the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." The First Amendment protects the freedom of speech, including the freedom to assemble or protest, freedom of religion, and freedom of the press. This means that people can express their opinions, point of views, and ideas without government interference or retaliation. The term "speech" includes all forms of expression, not just words, but also what a person wears, reads, performs, protests, and more.
Public universities, like App State, are required to follow the First Amendment, which means that App State has a very limited ability to restrict speech. In 2017, the North Carolina General Assembly passed the Restore/Preserve Campus Free Speech Act. In addition to the First Amendment, this law requires App State, as a public university in North Carolina, to maintain an environment in which freedom of speech is protected for all individuals. App State cannot legally shield students, staff, faculty, or other App State community members from speech protected by the First Amendment, including ideas and opinions that individuals may find unwelcoming, disagreeable, or even hateful.
The UNC System has a Policy on Free Speech and Free Expression that makes it clear that the university is committed to promoting open ideas and to protecting the fundamental right of free speech. App State is a place for individuals to learn, express, and debate ideas. However, the right to speak on campus is not a right to speak any time, at any place, and in any manner that a person wishes. App State must also provide a secure learning environment for individuals enrolled at or employed by App State and can impose reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on speech to make certain that free expression does not disrupt the academic and administrative operations of the University.
Although public universities like App State are generally not allowed to restrict speech, the right to free speech on public university campuses is subject to some restraints. App State has the right to place reasonable limitations on when, where, and how speech can occur to safeguard the university's ability to operate. These limitations are not a violation of free speech rights as long as the university does not take into consideration, or take a position on, the content or viewpoint of the speech when imposing such restrictions.
Yes. Certain types of speech, like perjury, blackmail, and child pornography are not protected under the First Amendment. Additional examples of unprotected speech include:
- True threats. The First Amendment does not give anyone the right to cause someone else to reasonably fear for his or her physical safety. The Supreme Court has ruled that "statements when the speaker means to communicate a serious intent to commit an act of unlawful violence to a particular individual or group of individuals" is a true threat – even if the speaker does not actually intend to carry it out. For example, in Virginia v. Black, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a statute prohibiting cross burning with the intent to discriminate was constitutional rather than an unlawful infringement on protected speech because, in light of the history of cross burning as a signal of impending violence, it was a type of intimidation likely to inspire fear of bodily harm.
- Incitement. The First Amendment does not give anyone the right to incite actions that would harm others or otherwise cause people to break the law, including to commit acts of violence. To qualify as incitement, the Supreme Court has said there must be a substantial likelihood of imminent illegal activity and the speech must be directed to cause imminent illegal activity. For example, the First Amendment would not protect a speaker on campus who directs the audience to engage in acts of vandalism or destruction of campus property following the event if there is a substantial likelihood that such statements would cause audience members to follow the directives.
- Defamation. The First Amendment does not protect written or spoken false statements about another individual that harms the individual's reputation, or that exposes them to hatred, contempt, or embarrassment.
The phrase "hate speech," often refers to speech that vilifies, humiliates or incites hatred against a particular group. This may include insults or language that demeans a person or group of people on the basis of their gender, race, sexual orientation, disability, religion, or ethnicity. There is no "hate speech" exception to the First Amendment. Hate speech is only illegal if it falls into one of the other categories of speech or conduct that are illegal, such as true threats, incitement of violence, or defamation. It is important to consider, however, that just because something can be said does not mean that it should be. App State is committed to promoting open ideas and to protecting the fundamental right of free speech. App State strives to create a fair and respectful environment where individuals can learn, express, and vigorously debate ideas.
Hate speech, by itself, does not violate App State's non-discrimination policy. However, when such speech goes beyond words to threats, targeted harassment, discrimination, or violence, that conduct is not protected under the First Amendment, and may violate App State's non-discrimination policy. Determining whether such conduct is protected requires review by App State administrators on a case-by-case basis.
The Constitution prohibits App State, as a public institution, from banning or punishing speech based on its content or viewpoint, no matter how repugnant such speech may be. App State also cannot exclude speakers from campus just because the speaker may make statements that offend a particular group or individuals. Similarly, App State will not cancel properly registered events just because members of the App State community may have strongly held concerns, however legitimate, about a speaker's viewpoint. The action of cancelling such a speaker because of the threatened, anticipated, or actual reactions from the opponents to that speech is sometimes called a "heckler's veto," and violates the First Amendment.
Protecting free speech as a fundamental right means that App State has to allow different viewpoints to be expressed, even views that contradict the values of App State and the community. Invitations to speak on campus given by student organizations and other groups should not be viewed as an endorsement of the speaker's views by App State.
Such requests are handled as set forth in App State's Freedom of Expression policy, available here: UNC Policy on Free Speech and Free Expression. App State considers all requests in accordance with that policy and does not consider or impose restrictions based on the event's content or viewpoint of any event speaker(s).
There are multiple ways to respond to speech that you find hateful or harmful. Some suggestions for responding to objectionable speech:
- Speak Back. Former Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis once advised that the best remedy for speech we dislike, including speech that is hateful or harmful, is "more speech, not enforced silence." Just as individuals have the right to express themselves using hate speech or speech that is otherwise intellectually unsound, you also have the right to express why that speech is invalid, poorly reasoned, repugnant, or unbalanced. Directly countering hateful speech with counterpoints can build awareness, undermine the legitimacy of the hate speech, and result in a stronger, more respectful community.
- Don't Restrict the Free Speech Rights of Others. Individuals on campus have the right to criticize, oppose, and protest the speech of others, as long as they do not obstruct or restrict the ability of anyone else to express their views. The use of violence or disruption to silence a speaker or prevent speech from occurring or continuing is prohibited. For example, shouting down a speaker during an event or physically blocking others from being able to see or hear a speaker essentially suppresses or censors the speaker and could be considered a violation of free speech. While you are allowed to peacefully protest, you should never physically engage with speakers in any way. Some speakers may try to provoke a response from you, but it is very important that you do not respond in a physical way. Doing so can lead to legal or administrative action against you. Notably, forcefully shutting down speech not only violates the constitutional rights of others, but it may have the unintended consequence of making the views of silenced individuals seem more legitimate or misunderstood.
- Disengage. While speakers have the right to speak, you do not have to listen. Denying a speaker the audience they seek by taking an alternative route, walking away, or engaging with others is an effective way to combat speech you find objectionable.
- Connect with Others. If the views someone expresses on campus are concerning or upsetting to you, you can connect with others on campus that share your values and interests, including through student organizations and university departments. Doing so can provide a helpful reminder that no one speaker represents the views of the entire App State community.
- 14-3, Punishment of misdemeanors, infamous offenses, offenses committed in secrecy and malice, or with deceit and intent to defraud, or with ethnic animosity
- 14-277.1, Communicating threats
- 14-288.2, Riot; inciting to riot; punishments
- 14-288.4, Disorderly conduct
- 14-288.5, Failure to disperse when commanded
- 14-401.14, Ethnic intimidation; teaching any technique to be used for ethnic intimidation
- 116-212, Campus of state-supported institution of higher education subject to curfew
- 143-318.17, Disruptions of official meetings
- Academic Affairs
- American Association of University Professors (AAUP)
- Office of the Dean of Students
- Intercultural Student Affairs
- University Ombuds Office
- Office of Diversity
- University Police Department
- Office of Title IX Compliance
- Wellness & Prevention Services
- Resiliency Toolkit
- Department of Government and Justice Studies
- Department of Communications
- Media Studies
Free Speech Responsible Officers
Each UNC constituent institution must identify officer(s) and/or offices or departments with responsibilities for ensuring compliance with the law and UNC policy, and for answering any related questions or concerns from students, faculty members, staff employees, or others.
Assistant Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs
Chief Diversity Officer